GUNS: Gang-banger factor

Print Article

Regarding Sholeh Patrick’s Oct. 5 column: By the second paragraph she asks “What’s going on?” One thing that is not taken into account is the amount of “mass shootings” and “level of gun use against innocents” is based upon a flawed premise.

As a law abiding citizen, I grow weary of being blamed for gang bangers in places like Chicago who are killing each other along with the innocents in their line of fire. They are criminals killing each other. Why don’t some of the white politician leaders in Illinois care about their predominantly black constituent shooting victims, or do black lives only matter when police officers shoot them? Apparently one of the most gun restrictive states and city in the country needs people like me to feel guilty when criminals and psychos run amuck. I know cops from up there; they are trying to do their jobs. How about we hold the self-serving politicians like Rahm Emanuel and their city council to some level of accountability?

I agree that some answers may not be easy, but there are some answers that are quite easy and were once employed in this country, which leads me to comparisons to the rest of the world. We are not a collectivist society. Any “collective” must be comprised of individuals, all with their unique interests, skills, desires and thoughts. Individualism along with individual responsibility and accountability are what has made America great, and a magnet for people who desire freedom from their socialist/progressive/Communist/Nazi governments. Those same collectivist-type governments always devolve into despotism as such a system requires all to conform to what is “best” for the group, with of course, some ruler who deigns it upon himself to dictate what that “best” is, usually at the point of guns that only the “leaders” now possess. Having just fought a revolution against the most powerful government and army in the world, our Founders “got” this. For a more current view, how are things working out for Venezuelans?

Her last paragraph states that Americans pay a heavy price for individual freedom instead of a trade-off for safety and security. To paraphrase one of our Founders, those that will trade freedom for safety and security will have neither.

ROBERT B. SMITH

Hayden

Print Article

Read More Letters to the Editor

CELLPHONES: Photo answers question

December 10, 2017 at 5:00 am | Coeur d'Alene Press All one needs to do to answer the Tuesday, Dec. 5, Coeur d’Alene Press’ question “Are cellphones a communication device, learning tool, or distraction in the classroom?” is to look at the accompanyin...

Comments

Read More

POEM: A Very Special Day

December 10, 2017 at 5:00 am | Coeur d'Alene Press When I think upon the Christmas child, It’s hard to comprehend. Why God would send his only Son To take away man’s sin. But in his love he sought to draw All men unto his side. So he sent h...

Comments

Read More

GRASSLEY: Take it back

December 10, 2017 at 5:00 am | Coeur d'Alene Press If you have not heard what Chuck Grassley said about you, check it out. His view is that people at the bottom of the pecking order don’t deserve a raise because they will just spend it on booze, movi...

Comments

Read More

TRUMP: Now picture this

December 10, 2017 at 5:00 am | Coeur d'Alene Press Imagine if President Obama had accepted help from Iran during his election. High ranking officials in Iran intervened in some way during the election in order to sway it in Obama’s favor. And Obama k...

Comments

Read More

Contact Us

(208) 664-8176
215 N. Second St
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814

©2017 The Coeur d'Alene Press Terms of Use Privacy Policy
X
X